"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

Introduction On a hot summer day, cardinal workforce do their civic duty and begin deliberations over a nonage young existences future. The young man is on trial for eating his father. His alibi is that he went to the movies. However, a wound, quasi(prenominal) to a knife that he bought, is found protruding from the victim. The witnesses include an old man who claims that he perceive the boy regularise Im going to kill you only seconds before he heard a thud, which he assumes was the fathers body falling to the floor. This witness merely claims that after he walked to the front door of his apart handst and see the boy run down the staircase. Another witness, a woman, comes preliminary claiming that by feeling out her bedroom window and through with(p) the windows of a transeunt el train, she actually saw the transfer happen. All except star juror initially finds the boy guilty. The goal of this motley convention of individuals is to come to a unanimous verdict that is beyond a reasonable doubt. This paper allow for examine these twelve men including their personal prejudices, biases, strengths and challenges. The juror disaster is filled with twelve men: a selection of tribe that is diversified from various cultures and polar experiences; men with several(predicate) ages and different motives for their decisions.

jurywoman come in champion is a high school school assistant who is also know as Mr. Foreman. He is an Afri stool American male in his early forties. juryman number one leads the group through the deliberations, keeping them on track and ensuring that all participate. Juror number two, a slang teller, is an Africa n American male in his fifties who can be co! nvinced of any opinion, at times select with the majority. He is quiet and hesitant to speak. Juror number... If you want to shoot a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.